Classical Clustering: Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)
Unlike traditional clustering algorithms like K-means, GMM introduces the concept of soft clustering, allowing data points to belong to multiple clusters with varying degrees of membership.
- Soft Clustering: GMM embodies the essence of soft clustering, where data points are probabilistically assigned to clusters based on the likelihood of membership.
- Mathematical Definition: GMM computes a weighted sum over Gaussian distributions, leveraging parameters like mean (μ), variance (Σ), and mixing coefficient (π) to model complex data distributions.
- Expectation Maximization (EM): The heartbeat of GMM lies in the Expectation Maximization algorithm, a two-step iterative process that refines cluster assignments and updates model parameters until convergence is achieved.
GMM Workflow
1. Initialization: Avoiding convergence issues is paramount, and a strategic initialization strategy is key. Leveraging insights from K-means clustering, GMM initializes parameters like mean, covariance, and mixing coefficient to kickstart the optimization process.
2. E Step (Expectation Step): In this phase, each data point is assigned a score indicating its likelihood of belonging to each cluster. These assignment scores govern the soft membership of data points to clusters.
3. M Step (Maximization Step): Here, model parameters are updated based on the assignment scores obtained in the E Step. From mean to covariance, each parameter undergoes refinement to better fit the data distribution.
4. Convergence Check: The iterative process continues until the likelihood stabilizes, signaling convergence and indicating optimal model parameters.
5. Iteration and Return: If convergence criteria aren’t met, the process iterates until stability is achieved, ultimately returning all model parameters for the Gaussian Mixture Model.
K Means vs. GMM
While both K-means and GMM are iterative clustering algorithms, they differ significantly in their approach and outcomes:
- Hard vs. Soft Clustering: K-means imposes hard boundaries, assigning each data point exclusively to one cluster, whereas GMM embraces soft clustering, allowing for nuanced membership probabilities.
- Parameterization: While K-means has a single parameter per cluster (center), GMM boasts three parameters per cluster: mean, mixing coefficient, and covariance, enabling richer data modeling.
- Iterative Optimization: Both algorithms iterate to refine cluster assignments and model parameters, but their underlying mechanisms vary, catering to different data structures and clustering objectives.
In the dynamic landscape of data analysis, understanding the nuances of clustering algorithms like GMM empowers data scientists and analysts to extract meaningful insights from complex datasets.
(Resource: CSE 6250 BigData for Healthcare Class material)
#GT #CSE6250 #BigDataforHealthcare #LectureSummary #MachineLearning #DataScience #Clustering #GaussianMixtureModel #EMAlgorithm
